Andrew’s Law: Expanding Responsibility & Encouraging Intervention in Hazing Cases

 By: Michael J. Pike & Robert C. Johnson 

 While Florida’s first anti-hazing law, the Chad Meredith Act, primarily established criminal penalties for hazing, it also set the foundation for holding organizations and individuals accountable for dangerous or harmful initiation practices. Lawmakers later recognized that more reforms were needed, leading to the passage of Andrew’s Law, which expanded responsibility and encouraged students to seek help in emergencies. 

Andrew’s Law was enacted following the death of a Florida State University student who died in 2017 after drinking excessive amounts of alcohol during a fraternity event. The circumstances surrounding his death raised concerns about the roles played by individuals who plan or encourage hazing activities, even if they are not physically present when harm occurs. 

Passed in 2019, Andrew’s Law broadened Florida’s hazing statute to allow prosecutors to pursue charges against individuals who plan, solicit, encourage, direct, or aid hazing, regardless of whether they are present at the time of the incident. This change reflects the reality that hazing often involves coordinated planning rather than spontaneous conduct. 

Another key component of Andrew’s Law is its limited immunity provision. The statute grants immunity from prosecution for certain hazing-related offenses to the first person who calls 911 or provides aid to a hazing victim. The goal of this provision is to remove hesitation and fear when medical assistance is urgently needed. 

Andrew’s Law also requires colleges and universities to improve how they document and disclose hazing incidents. The goal there is to increase accountability and ensure that students and families have clearer insight into how organizations are monitored and disciplined. 

Andrew’s Law represents Florida’s continued effort to address hazing through accountability and prevention. Together, these laws make clear that responsibility for hazing does not end with the person who directly causes harm. Individuals who contribute to a culture of hazing or knowingly allow it to happen may face legal consequences under Florida law. 

As with all hazing matters, civil claims may also arise, depending on the circumstances. Understanding how the law applies requires careful analysis of the facts in each case, including a detailed review of organizational policies, individual actions, and institutional oversight to determine liability. 

Pike & Lustig, LLP represents clients throughout Florida in complex civil litigation and personal injury matters, including cases involving hazing-related injuries. Individuals and families with questions about their legal rights are encouraged to seek guidance from a qualified attorney. 

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. Legal outcomes depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.